Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Dauplaise

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:39, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Dauplaise

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet the notability guideline for politicians or the general notability guideline (possibly WP:TOOSOON), no obvious target to which to redirect (contested prod) – Arms & Hearts (talk) 16:25, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:25, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:POLITICIAN. The user name of the article's creator suggests a COI. Location (talk) 01:17, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I think it should be kept. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.3.156.237 (talk • contribs) 2012-07-04 18:40:52

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 05:37, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no significant coverage in independent sources. Fails WP:GNG and WP:POLITICIAN. Valenciano (talk) 13:21, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.